Russian Defeat - Mongols capture the princes.

Saturday 31 May 2014

31 May, 1223, is the anniversary of the Russian defeat on the River Kalka in a battle against the Mongols. 

At the time the Rus were divided into many different principalities, chief amongst which was Kiev. 

These banded together to make a stand against the Mongols and form the first line of defence for Europe against the hordes of the Khans.

Not surprisingly, given the unstoppable nature of the Mongol advance, the Russians were utterly defeated.

Though the Mongols were to penetrate deep into Europe, overrunning Poland and reaching as far as Silesia at Liegnitz, where they defeated a combined German and Polish force, they soon withdrew eastwards again.

Hungary and Poland regained their lands, though they were devastated. Russia was not so lucky.

The Mongols remained on the steppes to the south, and moved there in large numbers. Descendents of the Mongols can still be found there today, called the Tartars, so called by the Slavs because they supposedly originated from Tartarus, the Greco-Roman word for Hell.

Their prolonged presence greatly impacted the development of Russian history. Mongol dress and culture hugely influenced Russian styles, where men wore long beards and large fur coats. Mongolian gutul were very popular amongst Russians for centuries.

This gave Russia a very non-European feel, contributing to isolation and a distinctive identity among Russians. Europeans did not consider them to be part of their culture, or only imperfectly juxtaposed with it. The Russians themselves regarded themselves as something other than European. Many Russians do even today.

The oriental despotism of the early Tsars was ended by Peter, who looked out beyond the parochial backwardness of the Russian people to Europe, especially Germany, and the Romanov dynasty was soon to become so thoroughly German as to be virtually indistinguishable from the Habsburgs or Hohenzollerns.

But despite their reforms and the tendency of the nobility to emulate the new Tsarist fashion, the mass of the people remained very much like they had been under the Mongol yoke.

Ivan the Terrible destroyed the Khan of Kazan, but it was only in the second half of the eighteenth century that the last of the Khans, those of the Crimea, were at last conquered by Russia in the reign of Catherine the Great.

By that time much historical development had occurred. The steppes, as a result of oppressive Mongol rule, and later constant Tartar raids, had been left horribly underpopulated. The roving bands of nomadic Cossacks, hardly different from Mongols themselves, began to settle there.

These people eventually became the Ukrainians. The Slavs farther north, in the forests of Moscow and Novgorod, had led an isolated existence separate from the western Slavs like the Poles, and from the Ukrainians. They continued to call themselves Russians, and it was they who eventually created the Russian Empire and settled Siberia.

This separate historical evolution was to have dire consequences for the Rus in the future. Though they spoke related languages, the Ukrainians gradually came to see themselves as separate people. Tsarist authorities continued to insist that Ukrainians were really just Russians. Often to differentiate, the authorities referred to those of the north and Siberia as "Great Russians," while referring to the Ukrainians of the steppe as "Little Russians."

In addition, the defeat of the Russians and the subsequent decline of the Mongol Khans permitted the extraordinary expansion of the Lithuanians. The Rus in the northern forests west of the Dnieper fell to the armies of Mindaugas and Algirdas.

The union between Lithuania and Poland perpetuated this separation of the so-called White Russians, centred around Minsk, from the Great Russians around Moscow.

Like the Ukrainians, this separate historical path resulted in the creation of a new ethnicity, the Belarussians, bel being the Slavic root for white, thus, White Russians. And Belarus is now an independent nation separate from Russia.

So we see that the defeat of the Rus at Kalka had enormous and decisive influence on their historical evolution. The unity of the Mediaeval Rus was broken forever. The steppes were depopulated, the people driven into the forests where they were isolated from Europe, and the conquests of the Lithuanians isolated those in the west from those in the east.

At the same time as the Rus was irrevocably divided between the Belarussians, the Russians, and the Ukrainians, Russian culture became profoundly influenced by the Mongols and took on a sharply divergent character from that of the rest of Europe, contributing much to Russia's semi-oriental appearance and delayed social, political, and economic progress, which has been consistently behind the rest of Europe ever since.

Pictured is a painting by Periklis Deligiannis depicting the capture of the Russian princes after their defeat on the River Kalka.

- Kaiser

Amphibious assault by the Ottoman Army during the First Balkan War.

One interesting operation was an audacious amphibious assault conceived by Enver Pasha and undertaken by the Ottoman Army during the First Balkan War. It was designed to take advantage of Turkish naval control of the Sea of Marmara, to afford flexibility to the Turkish armies in their contest with Bulgaria.
This was an exciting operation conceived by the Turkish General Staff designed to regain the strategic initiative in Thrace from the Bulgarians.
The armistice of December 1912-January 1913 broke upon the issue of Adrianople, the Aegean Islands, and the Rodosto-Midia Line. The Bulgarians insisted on obtaining both the Gallipoli Peninsula and Adrianople, with the Greeks insisting on gaining Lemnos, Tenedos, Imbros, and Samothrace.
The Turks were unwilling to concede all of this, and so sought to rescue such as they could by relieving Adrianople and throwing the Bulgarians out of Thrace.
The Greeks were unable to enter the Propontis because the Turkish guns on the Gallipoli Peninsula made that impossible. Thus the Turks were left with naval supremacy in the Sea of Marmara.
Enver Pasha intended to use this supremacy to good effect. The Bulgarians were deployed in four widely separated armies. The Bulgarian Second Army was surrounding and besieging the fortress of Adrianople to the northwest. The Bulgarian Fourth Army was holding positions on the northern neck of the Gallipoli Peninsula. The Bulgarian Third and First Armies were pinning the Turks behind the lines of Chataldzha just west of Constantinople, all visible on the map.
There were thus several miles between the Fourth, the Second, and the combined Third and First Armies.
Enver's plan was to reinforce the Turkish forces on the Gallipoli Peninsula and then use them to pin the Bulgarian Fourth Army while the Turkish Tenth Corps landed at Peristasis behind the Bulgarians. They would then sweep around the Bulgarian rear, sever them from the other Bulgarian Armies, and crush them between themselves and the Turkish forces in Gallipoli.
Meanwhile, the Turkish forces manning the lines of Chataldzha would attack the Bulgarian Third and First Armies to pin them in place. Once the Bulgarian Fourth Army was destroyed the Turks could move on to the Second Army, raise the siege of Adrianople, and force the Bulgarians to retreat from Thrace or else be destroyed.
Such was the plan. It was both daring and risky. It might have even worked, had not weather delayed the sailing of the flotilla.
This caused the Turks to attack from Gallipoli too early. The Turks underestimated the Bulgarian artillery strength as Bulgaria was intending to launch an offensive to sweep the peninsula of its defenders. The Turkish intelligence reported twenty-eight guns. But the Bulgarians had since that report reinforced their Fourth Army to possess over seventy pieces of artillery.
Consequently, the Turkish forces were mercilessly pounded with heavy artillery and their attack collapsed before the lead elements of the Tenth Corps had landed.
By that time the Bulgarians had discovered what the Turks were up to and shifted their forces northeast. The Turks successfully landed and secured a beachhead. They were unable to take the port of Peristasis itself, but under Enver Pasha's energetic leadership were able to create artificial piers to supply their army.
Enver had established a perimeter when he received word that the attacks from Gallipoli and from Chataldzha had completely failed. The Bulgarians used their high ground and their artillery to good advantage, and blasted the attacking Turkish infantry to pieces.
Even before these offensives had failed the Bulgarians had already been stripping units to form a response to the Turkish landing and it was increasingly clear to General Ahmet Izzet Pasha and the Turkish General Staff that the Tenth Corps was going to be annihilated if it did not evacuate.
Enver, disappointed as he must have been, nonetheless complied with this appraisal and ordered the evacuation. He formed a highly defensible collapsible perimeter and cleverly used the guns of the Turkish fleet to cover his retreat. Within a few days the Turks had abandoned their beachhead.
Given that the Turks had never before undertook such an operation and that they had hardly used their navy at all since the eighteenth century, it was remarkably successful. They landed and established a beachhead. They even built an artificial harbour.
So while it could be considered an impressive achievement in tactics and engineering, it was nonetheless an abysmal failure strategically. The Turks failed to regain the initative and exposed their armies to severe losses at Bulgarian hands. Adrianople was not saved. Though arguably it saved Gallipoli.
The Bulgarian response was swift and brutally effective. The Bulgarians withdrew to prepared defensive positions which they apparently had developed for just such a contingency, a solid example of clever foresight. Once secured behind these they could dispatch forces while still being confident of repulsing the Turkish offensives in the north and south, which doomed the Tenth Corps.
The rapidity of the Bulgarian reaction is indeed astonishing and impressive. On the night of 10 February the Turkish General Staff enquired of Enver what his strength was. He replied that he had perhaps 17,000 effectives, and no artillery, relying on the naval guns of the Turkish battleships.
This caused great consternation as the General Staff was aware that the Bulgarians had collected three complete divisions into a temporary provisional corps consisting of 50,000 men and 200 cannons.
Or in other words, very quickly the Bulgarians would be able to eradicate the Tenth Corps and perhaps sink the Turkish battleships with their artillery, which convinced Ahmet Izzet Pasha to order an immediate evacuation.
Enver Pasha's daring plan is a tantalising what-if in history. One can only imagine what the effect would have been on the war had the Bulgarian Fourth Army been destroyed between two fires, and the Turks allowed to threaten the rear of the others. Total retreat from Thrace was certainly a possibility. Perhaps the removal of Bulgaria from the war altogether.
Then things would not look pretty for the Greeks or Serbians, who would face the full brunt of the Turkish armies themselves, without their protective Bulgarian shield.
Fortunately for them, however, the Bulgarians were up to the task and very nearly came to eliminate 17,000 Turkish regulars from the war at a single stroke. The hunter turned hunted.
- Kaiser

On this day 1453 - End of the Mediaeval Era

Friday 30 May 2014

Some historians date today in 1453 as the end of the Mediaeval Age and the beginning of the modern era.

This is on account of the destruction of the last relic of antiquity, the Byzantine Empire, by the Ottoman Turks under Sultan Mehmed II.

The Byzantine Empire is a modern term referring to the Eastern Roman Empire that survived the fall of its western counterpart by nearly a millenium.

But after the death of Justinian in the seventh century, and certainly by the reforms of Heraclius, the empire ceased to have any classical Latin connexion. The old Roman Empire was Latin and pagan, the Byzantine Empire was Greek and Orthodox, thus the term Byzantine was coined to differentiate the two.

For centuries Byzantium and its wonderful capital of Constantinople held the line against the forces of Persia, the Arab Caliphates, and finally against the Turks. It remained the largest and richest city in Europe for generation after generation, a flourishing metropolis of wealth and culture.

But it was an empire in perpetual retraction. Enterprising emperors might restore a province, but it would soon be lost again. And always it would shrink.

After Manzikert the Turks began filtering into Anatolia, the heart of the empire, and gradually it became more and more Turkish in character.

As Byzantine infighting eroded the empire's ability to resist, and the ambitious Serbs and Bulgars of the Balkans, not to mention the energetic Italian republics of Pisa, Genoa, and Venice, continuously preyed upon the remaining possessions, the empire by the thirteenth century was dying.

By the fifteenth century the empire's authority over Epirus, Trebizond, and the Morea evaporated, leaving the heirs of the Caesars with nothing beyond the city of Constantinople itself.

At last the Turks tired of the phantom living on, and battered down the walls to capture the city for the crescent.

The fall of Constantinople was a shocking event for contemporary Europeans, who perceived in it the end of an era. The last vestiges of the Roman Empire were at last extinguished and the Greek Christian east was buried by Islam.

In Russia, the faithful Orthodox Russians began identifying themselves as the "third Rome," and their Tsars claimed to be the heirs of the Greek Emperors on the Bosphorus. This would fuel the rivalry between the Turks and the Russians for the Balkans and the Black Sea in later centuries.

Western Europe received an influx of Greek scholars, especially Italy, and some date the beginning of the Renaissance to this development.

And henceforth Hungary was to be on the front lines. Not long after the fall of Constantinople the Germans were to plunge themselves into virtual civil war with the fiery proclamations of Martin Luther, who claimed the victories of the Turks were evidence of the dissatisfaction of God.

These bloody religious wars that tore Germany apart, coupled with the dynastic contest between the Valois in France and the Habsburgs in Spain and Austria, paralysed the efforts of Germany to aid Hungary.

Therefore, in 1526, the Hungarian Kingdom was destroyed by the Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent, and in 1529 the Turks arrived before the walls of Vienna for the first time.

For the next two centuries the Turks were to contest Spain on the seas of the Mediterranean, and to batter against the defences of Austria, the last bastion of Europe, on land. Either way the Habsburgs were on the frontlines in both theatres, and their salvation of Europe from the Turks has been regarded as their historic mission both by themselves and by later historians.

Despite the zealous crusading spirit of numerous Popes and the determined efforts of much more powerful Russian autocrats in more recent history, Constantinople was never regained for the cross, and remains the largest and most important city in Turkey today.

Pictured is Sultan Mehmed II the Conqueror, advancing towards the city of Constantinople with his army.

- Kaiser

A bit about Cambodia. Khmer Rouge.

Thursday 29 May 2014

1975, the Cambodia Civil War ends as the Khmer Rouge capture Phnom Pehn and the Cambodian Government surrenders. 

You will probably know the Khmer Rouge for the Cambodian genocide but their attempts at agricultural reform and complete self sufficiency led to widespread famine and death from lack of medical care. The death toll is far larger than that of the killing fields. 

Their reign did not last long and was ousted as Vietnamese forces along with defectors from Cambodia drove the Khmer rouge west. Vietnam had intervened due to a history of border tension and risk of invasion from the Khmer Rouge. Cambodia was now under the control of the Vietnamese and defecting forces.

The support for the defectors, now known as the People's Republic of Kampuchea, given by the Vietnamese led to the Vietnamese themselves being invaded by china a a punishment. Both sides eventually claimed victory.

The People's Republic of Kampuchea failed to gain UN support with the US, UK and Chinese intervention and later their opposition from the previous government would give rise to 3 rebel factions, one of which was the former khmer rouge, still led by pol pot. The UK and US supported the two non-pol pot factions.

Vietnam withdrew in 1989 but not before it allowed the government it had set up to gain a significant foothold with strong military forces, however after a decade of fighting there was still no winner. In 1991 a treaty was signed between the pro-Vietnamese government and the Khmer Rouge but was violated when in 1992 the khmer rouge resumed fighting and boycotted an election.

After internal struggles, the setting up of a new Khmer Rouge called the Provisional Government of National Union and National Salvation of Cambodia in 1994. The Khmer Rouge now fought the new Cambodian government which included the former pro-Vietnamese Communists as well as the Khmer Rouge's former non-Communist and monarchist allies, there was a mass defection in 1996. Pol Pot was arrested and imprisoned by the Khmer Rouge after the monarchist factions in the new government appealed to the Khmer Rouge to stop the fighting, though they refused to deal with Pol Pot which led to bloody factional fighting within the Khmer Rouge and in 1998 and 1999 the final supporters of the Khmer rouge surrendered, apologized for the genocide and the Khmer Rouge ceased to exist. 



-ancylla

Sir Nicholas Winton.

Tuesday 27 May 2014

Maf 19th is the 105th birthday of Sir Nicholas Winton. In 1939, Sir Nicholas masterminded the transportation of children from Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia to Britain, saving them from the concentration camps.

in 1938 a friend urged Winton to abandoned his plans to go skiing and instead go visit Prague to witness what was happening in the country considering that Germany had invaded Sudetenland a couple of months earlier and Prague was becoming a dangerous place for Jews.

At that time agencies were planning the mass evacuation of Jewish children from Austria and Germany but none for Czechoslovakia.

Sir Nicholas Winton began meeting with parents who were desperate to get their children to safety. Winton soon began compiling a list of the names of these children.

On March 14, the day before German troops marched into Czechoslovakia, the first train with rescued children left Prague.

Sir Nicholas Winton went to Britain to mastermind the rescue mission making sure that each child had an adoptive home, pleaded for funds to make sure each child had money secured to one day return home, and securing permits to enter and exit the country. Rumors have it that in some cases Winton forged some documents to some of these children were able to Czechoslovakia since some of the permits were taking too long to arrive.

A total of eight trains carrying children reached London. The ninth did not due to Germany invading Poland and all borders being closed. That train was carrying a total of 250 children.

Winton rarely spoke of what he did, the reason it went into public was because he kept a scrapbook containing pictures of the children, documents, letters and a list of the children who were rescued; a family friend gave the scrapbook to a local newspaper and soon the story was taken up by That’s Life!, the consumer program hosted by Esther Rantzen.

Sir Nicholas Winton, who was then 78, was invited to the show and to his surprise the audience was made up of the now adults he had once rescued as children.

One of the guest at his birthday celebration was Lord Dubs who was one of the many he rescued. He was six years old when his parents put him on one of the trains. His parents survived and was reunited with them after the war.

While the exact number of children rescued by this man and his efforts is not known, it is estimated that he did save 669 Jewish children.

In 1998, president Václav Havel invited Winton for a private visit to Prague and awarded him with the order of T.G. Masaryk. In his home country, Winton was awarded the OBE. Thus his full name now goes by the title Sir Nicholas Winton. There is also a petition on Change.org for him to win a Nobel Peace Prize.

“Most of the children never saw their parents again so I was exceptional. Don’t put me down as typical. I can still see Prague station – the children, the parents, the soldiers with swastikas. We set off and when the next evening we got to Holland, all the older ones cheered because we were out of reach of the Nazis. I didn’t fully understand. It wasn’t until many years later that I understood what had happened and discovered all about Nicholas. When you meet somebody who almost certainly saved your life, it’s very emotional. I didn’t quite know how to handle it. I owe my life to him.” -Lord Dubs

-That.One.Mexican.Chick-

Tito Quote on Churchill

Monday 26 May 2014

Churchill, he is a great man. He is, of course, our enemy and has always been the enemy of Communism, but he is an enemy one must respect, an enemy one likes to have. -Josip Broz Tito

-ancylla




Possible Consequences of a Spanish Entry into WWII on the side of the Axis

Saturday 24 May 2014


On 23 October, 1940, Franciso Franco, the Caudillo of Spain, attended a meeting arranged with Adolf Hitler at the small town of Hendaye is southwestern France to discuss Hispano-German relations. Ever since then people have been intrigued by the idea of Spain joining forces with the Axis in the Second World War. While this was indeed a possibility, I hope to examine and speculate upon the likely, immediate, affects on the course of the war. I dare not speculate too much, as indeed speculating at all is very risky and unprofessional. Nonetheless I believe a somewhat accurate idea of what would have happened within a short time after Spain's entry can be guessed at.
   
Our first order of business is to establish the national strength of Spain in late 1940 and how the entry of it into the war would change the balance in general, and in separate theatres. Many things affect the strength of a nation, including the size of the population, that population's education, its ethnic composition, the size of the nation's standing armies, its trained reserves, its industrial capacity, its wealth, its geostrategic position, its access to and possession of sources of raw materials and food, its number of warships, the amount of merchant tonnage under its flag, its general infrastructure, number of aircraft. All of these factors have a serious impact on a nation's strength and Spain's comparative level in each would go a long way in informing us of Spain's strength and how that measured up with its contemporary powers.
   
First on the list is geography. Spain occupies 504,030 km2 on the arid Iberian Peninsula, jutting southwest from France. It is separated by the Pyrenees Mountains from the rest of Europe, and encircles Portugal to the north and east. It's consisted primarily of a Central Plateau called the Meseta, which dips to sea level near the coasts. Cantabria in the north, has a very mild climate reminiscent of nearby southwest France, and has temperate forests. Catalonia forms the east coast and has a warm sunny Mediterranean climate resembling that of Italy or nearby southern France. Andulusia, in the South, is hot, sunny, and arid. Douglas Porch records it as reminding people "more of Africa than of Europe," and is very similar to nearby Morocco across the Sea of Almeria. Castile, the heart of the country, as well as Leon and Aragon, occupy the Meseta, a plateau with cold winters and hot summers. The Meseta most closely resembles the plateau of Central Anatolia in the peninsula on the other side of the Mediterranean, and in some respects the highlands of Persia. Spain is criss-crossed by mountain ranges and rivers, most of which tend to run east-west, rather than North-South. As a peninsula, Spain is surrounded by water, and possesses a coastline 9,964 km2, which is longer than its slightly larger neighbour, France.
    
Now on to demographics. Spain's population in 1940 was roughly 25,757,000. For a Western European nation of its size, it wasn't very large. Italy, occupying 303,000 km2, had a population of around 44,467,000, nearly 20 million more than Spain. In 1940 Spain was still socially backwards. The population was still very religious, being Catholic and conservative. Sources I've found say Spain's literacy was "over 50%." How much over, I haven't been able to find. One of the sources also say that Austria and Hungary were "over 70%" literacy. So I believe we can safely deduce that Spain's literacy was between 50% and 70%, leaning more towards the former. Spain's people also spoke a myriad of languages. Castilian Spanish was predominant, but in 1940 many people spoke Catalan, Basque, Galician, Andulusian, and some Portuguese, and many of these had no proficiency in Castilian. This would make integration in a national army more problematic, and the reduced literacy would tend to generate lower quality NCOs, leaving the army less efficiently led and organised. These problems I'm familiar with in my research of Austria. The Austro-Hungarian Empire faced very similar problems in its attempt to construct a national army in WWI, though of course Spain's problems were too a lesser degree.

The Spanish Army in 1940 stood at 600,000 men. Many of these were conscripts that were poorly trained and equipped. Spain doesn't appear to have enacted any universal conscription laws prior to 1940, which meant its trained reserves would not be very impressive. It could call several hundred thousand more men to the colours, of course, but these would take time to equip and train, and would be unable to take part in immediate action. However, their standing forces did have recent combat experience in the Spanish Civil War, though it wasn't modern style warfare. Most of Spain's vehicles and armour were supplied by foreign sources. The Republican side during the civil war received some 200 Soviet tanks, some of which were appropriated by Franco after the war, but the majority consisted of 155 L-3-35 light tanks from Italy, and 122 Panzer I light tanks from Germany. Spain possessed 290 batteries of guns, with roughly 6 guns per battery, giving Spain some 2,000 pieces, again many from Germany or Italy. This is, again, not very impressive. Spain's armour was barely 400 machines, contrasted to France's 3,000 at the same time, and 2,500 German (taken from the forces engaged in the Battle of France, summer of 1940, a few months before Hendaye). In artillery it contrasts very unfavourably with its contemporaries. Germany possessed 7,500 pieces for the Battle of France, while France possessed over 10,000, and the British, with less than 300,000 men, less than half Spain's forces, nonetheless possessed nearly as many guns at 1,300.

The air force at Spain's disposal in 1940 consisted of some 600 aircraft of all types. Again, most of these were older Italian or German models, many being Savoia-Marchetti SM-81s or Junkers Ju-52s for the bombers, and Fiat CR-32s and Heinkel He-51s for fighters. These were not particularly effective planes for even the Germans or the Italians. The Messerschmitt Me-109 and the Macchi C.202 Folgore were the standard work horses of the Luftwaffe and the Regia Aeronautica respectively, and both were much better than the models given to Spain. The planes the Spaniards flew would have been chewed to pieces by the standard French fighters, the Bloch MB.150, of which 593 were built by France before France's surrender, or the Supermarine Spitfire and the Hawker Hurricane, of which the British had over 1,000 on hand by the beginning of the Battle of Britain. British production could also easily outstrip Spain's, as Spain was reliant on Germany and Italy for more aircraft, while Britain produced nearly 20,000 of the Spitfires by the end of the war.

At sea the Spanish Navy constituted a completely paltry force and was perhaps the weakest of all branches of the Spanish military. Here again the models were constructed mainly by foreigners, in foreign yards. It was composed of 6 Cruisers, 18 Destroyers, 19 Torpedo Boats, and 9 Submarines, with a handful of auxiliary vessels. Of the Cruisers, the 1 of the Blas de Lezo-Class was constructed in the Spanish yards indigenously at Ferrol, as were the 3 of the Almirante-Class. The 2 Canarias-Class Heavy Cruisers, being the largest and most powerful of Spain's warships, were constructed by Vickers in the United Kingdom. For the Destroyers, the 3 Alsedo-Class, and the 13 vessels making up the Churrucca I and Churrucca II-Classes were all constructed autochthonously at Cartagena. The other 2 Destroyers, named the Ceuta and Mellila, were originally built in Italy for the Romanian Navy, named Viscol and Vifor, respectively. They were seized upon completion by the Italian Navy and rechristened Falco and Aquila, respectively, and were given to Spain in 1937. The Torpedo Boats were all entirely constructed in foreign yards. The 9 T-1-Class were all built in Germany. The LT-15 and LT-16 were built in the Soviet Union and given to the Republican side in the Civil War, and were requisitioned by Franco. The 4 Torpedo Boats named Badajoz, Oviedo, Requeté, and Toledo were all originally GermanSchnellboote built by Lürssen in Bremen. The remaining 4, the Sicilia, Nápoles, Cándido, and Javier Quiroga were MAS Italian ships constructed in various Italian yards. The 9 submarines in Spain's possession were also all foreign built. 2 were of the Archimedes-Class, that were built by the Cavallini shipyard in Italy for the Italian Navy in the early 1930's, and the other 6 were of the Holland-Class, constructed by Vickers in the United Kingdom.
    
When we compare it to other contemporary fleets its weakness becomes readily apparent. The Italian Navy in 1940 consisted of 6 Battleships, 19 Cruisers, 59 Destroyers, 67 Torpedo Boats, and 116 Submarines. When contrasted against its potential adversaries the picture is even more bleak. The French Navy at the time of France's surrender included 6 Battleships, 2 Battlecruisers, 1 Aircraft Carrier, 20 Cruisers, 60 Destroyers, and 80 Submarines, and gets really gloomy when compared to the Royal Navy, which possessed 12 Battleships, 3 Battlecruisers, 7 Aircraft Carriers, 66 Cruisers, 184 Destroyers and 60 Submarines. The British also had several ships on the slipways under construction, including 5 more Battleships, and 23 more Cruisers, far more powerful than the entire Spanish Navy.

The Spanish Merchant Fleet was also less than impressive. Spain had 642 merchant vessels hoisting its flag, composing a fleet of 899,209 tonnes. In comparison to this meagre fleet, the British possessed 9,285 ships at 19,541,364 tonnes, by themselves. If we add the 2,068 ships possessed by the British Commonwealth, standing at 1,732,700 tonnes, the British Empire as a whole possessed 21,274,064 tonnes, or something like 24 times the shipping of Spain. When you take into account that the British had several supply problems despite their vast merchant fleet, you get the idea of how difficult it would be for Spain to maintain a presence overseas. It would be dependent on Italian shipping, and Italian shipping proved to be largely inadequate even for Italian purposes.
    
Gauging Spain's wealth was a bit more problematic, given the sparsity of sources. However, I was lucky enough to stumble upon Spain's per capita, and using that I was able to extrapolate a rough estimate of Spain's GDP (which I know is quite accurate because I applied the same mathematical formula to Italy and landed within 2 billion dollars of Italy's actual listed GDP). So, my figures show Spain's GDP to be $62 billion in 1940. This is very poor for a Western European nation. Italy's GDP stood at $147 billion, while France's was $164 billion, Japan's was $192 billion, the UK's was $316 billion, Germany's was $387 billion, the USSR's was $417 billion, and finally the US's was $943 billion. So you can see that Spain was really small fish compared to even Italy, and the discrepancy just gets wider and wider, the UK being 5 times as rich as Spain, and ultimately the US being 15 times as rich as Spain.
    
Then we add this to the equation, Spain's foreign currency and gold reserves were practically non-existent, its economy was hard hit by the civil war. In infrastructure Spain's kilometres of both track and paved roads were well below the Western European average. Spain lacked a solid industrial base, and therefore an ability to prosecute a modern war, as was revealed by the large numbers of ships and machines Spain was forced to rely on foreign powers to obtain. Spanish facilities and Spanish shipyards were simply insufficient to produce modern material for war. Indigenously Spain constructed a mere 4 Trubia tanks, as well as 2 Landesas, and 3 Verdejas. Production of a mere 9 tanks by native industries does not imply a very expansive industrial foundation. Plans for domestically produced aircraft were likewise unimpressive. The Spanish HA-1112 fighter was planned to be put into production and 1,000 models built. However, since it required the Daimler-Benz DB 605 engine, and Germany didn't even have enough for its own aircraft, only a few aircraft were produced, and the first one didn't appear until 1944. The obvious conclusion is that Spain would be horribly incapable of replacing even the few obsolete machines it possessed, and would be entirely dependent on Italy and Germany for aircraft and armour, as well as for transport vehicles, rolling stock, and even warships.
    
Spain was largely deficient in many natural resources. Almost all of Spain's oil had to be imported from the United States. Due to the devastation of the civil war Spanish agriculture had collapsed and was unable to even feed the population, and therefore Spain was importing large amounts of foodstuffs from the United States and Canada. Spain did possess large deposits of iron and coal, but they were difficult to access, and it largely just exported it and did not possess many industries to turn the iron into steel, nor the steel into vehicles and ships. So in the vital supplies of food and oil, Spain would be forced to turn to Germany to make good the shortfall in imports that would inevitably follow Spanish entry into the war due to Spanish weakness at sea and British supremacy on the same. Given that both Douglas Porch and Vincent O'Hara have attested that the Italian Fleet was stranded at anchor for long periods at a time due to the lack of fuel, one can assume the Germans would be as reluctant to deplete their own stocks for Spain as they were for Italy.
    
Now we come to the matter of Spanish aims, and what they could potentially receive from the war. No doubt Spain would very much like to reclaim Gibraltar, and perhaps Morocco. There were also irredentist claims to regain the Roussillon from France, lost in 1659. Given Spain's weakness in artillery and in aircraft, assaulting Gibraltar would be difficult for them, especially since the British could block any of their seaward attempts. Taking it without German support would be most formidable. The seizure of Gibraltar would also be of little strategic benefit for the Axis. In 1940, due to Italy's entry, the Admiralty had already redirected all traffic to the east around the Cape of Good Hope, therefore its fall would not affect the ocean-going traffic of the British merchant fleets. Furthermore, Gibraltar's inhabitants were overwhelmingly pro-British, and therefore anti-Spanish. Its reincorporation would be symbolic at best.
    
When considering gains made at France's expense, we have the actual example of Italy before us. Vichy yielded nothing to the Italians. The Italians had entered the war intending to annex Nice, Savoy, Corsica, and Tunisia. Vichy gave them none of these. It was not until the Germans ended Vichy during Operation Anton in 1942 that the Italians finally received these, and they were resisted. There is no reason to assume that Vichy would have yielded to Spanish demands, and there's no reason to believe Hitler would pressure Vichy on them. Hitler was most anxious to keep Vichy, and in particular its formidable fleet and large empire, out of the hands of the Allies. He did this by holding Vichy hostage and threatening them with war. If Spain attacked Vichy in either Morocco or over the Pyrenees, they'd risk the immediate defection of the French fleet and empire to the Allies, and their loss would be hardly offset by Spain's entry. So Spain's prospects for gains seem rather limited.
    
If the Spanish did attack the French in Morocco, they'd find themselves hard pressed to maintain any army with the amount of shipping they possessed, which the British would sink whenever and wherever they happened upon it. On the ground the French possessed superior firepower in the form of better artillery and better armour, and much better aircraft. The French also possessed superior knowledge and experience of desert warfare. Even without their metropole the French would be a tough nut to crack for Spain alone. Again it would likely need help from Italy and Germany. Morocco would also hardly be a lucrative acquisition. It was a drain on France's finances, it would be a much more onerous burden on the muchpoorer Spain, who had suffered greatly simply holding the Rif in the interwar years, which even necessitated French intervention to rescue Spain from defeat. Therefore Spain's gains were largely economically and strategically illusory.
    
I'm going to take this opportunity to briefly go over the actual performance of Italy during the Second World War, Italy's position being closest to Spain's in all respects, to shed some light on how Spain may have fared. Italy entered the war in June, 1940, and was quite unprepared to do so. Its Alpine forces found themselves outmatched by their French opposites, and the much smaller French forces inflicted a severe check on their assault into Provence. The French Navy shelled the city of Genoa with impunity. The Italians subsequent to France's fall invaded Western Egypt, but were ill-supplied with vehicles and sufficient armour. The more mobile British forces, with heavier tanks, crushingly defeated the Italians, and swept them far westwards into their own colony of Libya. Though the Italians managed to briefly take British Somaliland in East Africa, Field Marshal Lord Archibald Wavell was able to wrap them up in this part of Africa after a short campaign, taking Addis Ababa from them. In October, 1940, the Italians attacked Greece from their neighbouring territory of Albania. They were humiliatingly defeated by the Greeks under General Alexandros Papagos and the Greeks even took Southern Albania from them. In early 1941, British forces began arriving in Greece to assist them against Italy. Hitler, alarmed by the British threat to the Romanian oilfields intervened both in the Balkans and in Libya to shore up the Italians, thus wasting German forces and time rescuing the Italians. At the same time, the Italians fared poorly at sea. Their navy was badly handled by Admiral Lord Andrew Cunningham at Cape Matapan, and during the daring raid at Taranto. Italy's constant lack of fuel hamstrung her naval actions, and Italy's coasts were naked to British seapower.
    
Italy became increasingly dependent upon Germany, not only for resources and weapons, but for actual German military personnel, pulling the Germans away from more vital theatres, i.e., Russia. When Italy finally collapsed, the Germans were forced to take up the burden of defending the Apennine Peninsula in order to protect Germany itself. Given that the Allies possessed complete dominance of the sea, the Germans were in a most exposed and perilous position. Luckily for them the Americans were insistent that all Allied shipping be gathered in Britain, and ignored Churchill's pleas to allot any of it to Sir Harold Alexander. Otherwise Alexander may have been able to continuously outflank the Germans by landing behind them, and so cut them off. The Allies could easily have repeated the maneuvre several times until they bagged all the Germans or drove them from the peninsula completely. Therefore the whole business with Italy can only be considered a costly distraction for the Germans, that they were lucky wasn't even more costly as it could easily have been.
    
My conclusions for Spain are that its performance would broadly mirror Italy's, except Spain was even weaker militarily and industrially than Italy was. Spain, as I've demonstrated, was weaker in all respects to Italy, and much weaker than its immediate adversaries France and the United Kingdom, not to mention the Soviet Union and the United States. Because of its dependence on imports, and its long coastline, it, like Italy, would be rapidly starved of food and oil by the British. Germany would have had to deplete its own stocks to make good the shortfall. My belief is that Hitler would put pressure on Portugal to join the Axis once Spain joined. I assume Portugal would refuse to fight its ancient ally Britain, which would be economic suicide anyway, and thereafter Hitler would goad the Spanish to attack Portugal. My conclusion is that Spain would fail against Portugal, and the British would then land in Portugal like they did in Greece. Once the British landed in Portugal, Hitler would feel compelled to eject them, diverting substantial German forces both to overrun Portugal and to secure Gibraltar. The benefits of this would be minimal, Portugal was worthless, and Gibraltar's fall would not ruin Britain, as I explained earlier. On the other hand, the Germans would have had to definitely call off Sealion earlier, and would have wasted their strength and their time messing around in Iberia, setting the clock back for Barbarossa.
    
At the same time, Spain's long coasts would be naked to British, and later American, amphibious assaults. Spain's ability to resist these would be considerably less than Italy's, and therefore the Germans would once more have to take up the responsibility themselves, lest the weak Spaniards allow the Allies a foothold on the European Continent, diluting their strength even further. All of Spain's colonies, as well as the Canary Islands, would be forfeit to the British. Once the Americans joined, Germany would be forced to hold in Iberia, in Italy, in the Balkans, in France, in Scandinavia, in the Low Countries, in Germany itself, and at the same time grapple with Russia in the east.
    
To sum up, I come to the ironic conclusion that Spain's entry on the side of Germany would be the best thing that could possibly happen for the Allies. Spain would have constantly drained German resources, since it would be incapable of producing its own material of war, and was too weak to challenge the British at sea. It would therefore be useless against Britain, let alone the US or Russia. Spain would simply languish, being propped up by Germany, until the Germans were so weakened by their fighting in Russia that they couldn't hold out in Spain anymore, and Spain would therefore fall to the Allies. Without Gibraltar the British would still have survived in Egypt, as they survived when they practically treated Gibraltar as if it did fall, Spanish attacks on Morocco would do nothing to harm them, and their weakness would distract Germany and just cause Germany to lose against Russia even faster than it actually did. So I come to the rather amusing resolution, that far from encouraging Spain to join, the Germans should have tried to keep both them and Italy neutral. Germany would have done much better without chasing Mediterranean chimeras.

- Kaiser

A Critical Examination of the Spanish-American War.

The Spanish-American War is particularly useful in the illustration of the principles of sea power.

Naturally, as we all know, Spain was defeated and lost the majority of what remained to her of her once vast empire, retaining only Rio de Oro, Spanish Guinea (with the island of Fernando Pó), and later acquiring Northern Morocco.

But what was lost was far more substantial; the islands of Cuba and Puerto Rico, together with the smaller islands attached to them, and in the Pacific the Philippines and Guam, were ceded to the United States. In addition, Spain later sold the Caroline and Mariana Islands, together with Palau, to Germany.

Despite later perceptions, this was not a result of Spanish fragility. Spain was actually rather well matched against its adversary. The opposing fleets shall be described below.

With the terminal loss of the USS Maine, the United States Navy was divided between three centres.

The Pacific Squadron formed around the USS Oregon, a pre-dreadnought battleship armed with four 13-inch guns and eight 8-inch guns, based in San Diego, California.

For immediate available use were the two squadrons formed from the remaining ships in the Atlantic.

The first was the North Atlantic Fleet under Admiral William Thomas Sampson, composed of the battleships Iowa, with four 13-inch guns and eight 8-inch guns, Indiana with four 12-inch and eight 8-inch guns, the heavy cruiser New York with eight 8-inch guns, and the very light cruisers Vixen and Gloucester with only four 2.2-inch guns. This fleet was based at Key West in the islands off the southwest tip of Florida. To it was designated the task of declaring and enforcing the blockade of Havana, the capital of Spanish Cuba.

The second of these was the Flying Squadron under Admiral Winfield Scott Schley. This was made up of the battleships Massachusetts, with four 12-inch guns and eight 8-inch guns, and Texas with two 12-inch and six 6-inch guns, with the heavy cruiser Brooklyn with eight 8-inch guns, and the light cruisers Columbia and Minneapolis with one 8-inch and two 6-inch guns. These were based on Norfolk, Virginia, taking what was believed to have been an ideal central position to rush out to defend the American Atlatnic coast either north or south should the Spanish appear.

Given the weakness of American shore defences and almost total lack of coastal artillery, the country was very fearful of the Spanish possibly striking the coasts of the eastern seaboard, and until the location and intentions of the Spanish fleet were known, it was decided to keep Schley in the Hampton Roads at Norfolk, Virginia, over nine-hundred miles from Key West, and even farther when one considers that Sampson would most often be another one-hundred miles to the southward off Havana.

Thus the two detachments of the American fleet, roughly equal, where divided and placed too far away from one another to have been within rapid supporting distance. This was a grave strategic mistake in violation of the concentration of force maxim, which may have cost the US much if Spain had taken advantage of it.

Spain was unable to do so because the Spanish Ministry of Marine made a very foolish division of its own fleet into two separate bodies.

The first of these was the Caribbean Squadron under Admiral Pascual Cervera. This was comprised of the heavy cruisers Cristóbal Colón, with one 11-inch and two 8-inch guns,Vizcaya, Infanta Maria Teresa, and Almirante Oquendo, all armed with two 11-inch guns and ten 5.5-inch guns, and the destroyers Plutón, Terror, and Furor, armed with two 6-inch guns and several torpedoes. These, upon the outbreak of war, were coaling in the port of Mindelo on the Portuguese island of São Vicente, in the Cape Verde Islands off the west coast of Africa.

Spain's other squadron was named the Second Squadron, under Admiral Manuel Cámara. This was made up of the battleship Pelayo, with two 12.6-inch and two 11-inch guns, the heavy cruiser Emperador Carlos V with two 11-inch and eight 5.5-inch guns, the very light cruisers Rapido and Patriota, armed with 2.2-inch guns, and the destroyers Audaz, Osada, and Prosepina, armed with two 6-inch guns and torpedoes, with the transports Buenos Aires, Panay, Alfonso XII, and Antonio Lopez. This squadron was based on the port of Cádiz on the southwest coast of Spain itself.

From this one can see that the Spanish ships were outgunned by the American battleships. But not overwhelmingly. Especially given the division of the American fleet. If Cámara and Cervera were united they'd oppose two American battleships and one heavy cruiser with one battleship of their own, and five heavy cruisers together with six destroyers.

Now it is often said that a ship that has not the range of its enemy is bound to fail. This is often true, insofar as the ship also lacks the requisite speed to bring her own inferior armament within range. The Spanish ships were all faster than the American ships, especially as the American squadrons could only move as fast as their slowest member, the battleships. The Americans would have to decide between chasing five heavy cruisers with one of their own, which was outgunned by every single Spanish cruiser, or else slowing their cruisers to the same speed
as the battleships, in order to rely on their support.

In the former case such a choice could result in the destruction of the cruiser in isolation. In the latter case that would allow the Spanish to run if they did not wish for a fight. Or it would allow the Spanish to strike and retire at their leisure, as they could not be caught.

The second problem was that so long as the Spanish fleet's destination and intentions were unknown, the possibility of them striking the coast of the US remained on the table, however remote, and public clamour caused the government to feel that it was necessary to keep Schley in Norfolk.

Spain's problems, by comparison were of a somewhat different nature. Since Cuba would fall unless relieved, deficient as it was of foodstuffs, Spain needed to break the American blockade. The best way to do this was to destroy the two separated American squadrons with their own squadrons united.

Unfortunately, once war was declared, Cervera had to quit the Cape Verde Islands given Portugal's neutrality. He ought to have been able to sail northwards to form a junction with Cámara coming from the opposite direction at Las Palmas de Gran Canaria in the Spanish-controlled Canary Islands.

But since Cámara's squadron was not yet done refitting, and the Spanish government felt that withdrawing Cervera's squadron to the north would look like a confession of weakness, it instead ordered Cervera alone to sail directly for the Caribbean, despite his objections.

This was a strategically foolish decision. It precluded any possibility of Cámara and Cervera uniting in the future, and opposed only four heavy cruisers against two battleships and one heavy cruiser. The Americans of either squadron were equal to Cervera, who would thus risk his own destruction even by engaging them divided.

Nonetheless Cervera had the element of surprise and was still much faster than his opponents. When he raised anchor from Mindelo, the US Department of the Navy knew not where he was headed.

So long as Cervera remained at large his fleet embodied the "fleet-in-being" concept. The idea of the fleet-in-being was first defined by English Admiral Lord Torrington in his contest with the French Admiral the Comte de Tourville in the English Channel in the year 1690 during the Nine Years' War. He defined it thus;

"Had I fought otherwise, our fleet had been totally lost, and the kingdom lain open to invasion. As it was, most men were in fear that the French would invade; but I was always of another opinion, for I always said that whilst we had a fleet in being, they would not dare to make an attempt."

Essentially this means that the fleet-in-being, simply by existing, threatens the sea communications of an enemy and can potentially cut them so long as it stays afloat. So that the fleet must be neutralised or destroyed before any undertaking dependent upon maritime communications can be envisioned. Which meant, for our example, that the US could land no troops on Cuba or Puerto Rico until Cervera showed his hand.

Which was not long in coming. On 29 April, 1898, Cervera's squadron weighed anchor from Mindelo. Looking at the map, Puerto Rico lay between Spain and Cuba, and on that island lay the defended anchorage of San Juan.

There Cervera could find coal and provisions. This would give him a secure base far from Key West, and allow him to intercept Schley should he attempt to sail south. Additionally he would still be outside the American fleet's wider area of operation, and could thus wait there for Cámara, or if need be, to withdraw to the east to fall back on Cámara.

The United States with only two squadrons had hoped to blockade not only Havana, but also Cienfuegos, Santiago de Cuba, and San Juan. But they found this beyond their strength. Sampson duly imposed the blockade on Havana, but since Cienfuegos was on the south coast of the island, the opposite from Havana, he was unable to effectively blockade it. Given his resources, he was also unable to blockade Santiago or San Juan at all.

So if Cervera arrived in San Juan he'd be in a favourable position to play havoc with Sampson's blockade, which did not escape the calculations of his enemies.

Sampson, apparently believing himself capable of gleaning his enemy's intention on account of this observance, sailed east for Puerto Rico. On 7 May he reached Cape Haïtien, on the northern coast of Haiti.

Receiving no news of the Spaniards, he decided to continue with his plans and push east for Puerto Rico hoping to either find the Spanish within the harbour or to catch them when they arrived. Accordingly, on the morning of 12 May, Sampson arrived off San Juan and began shelling the forts protecting its entrance.

But it would appear that his thoughts were uneasy. On 9 May he received a report that Cervera had been off Guadaloupe, and another that he had actually put in at St. Thomas. Guadaloupe was a possession of France, and St. Thomas was at this time still a possession of Denmark, which would later be sold to the US in 1917.

Neither of the reports were true, but their basic strategic reality was. Cervera had in fact decided to give Sampson the slip. On 10 May, Cervera had arrived off the French island of Martinique, curiously enough a little to the south and a day later than had where he had been reported in the false alarm. Cervera had sent the destroyer Terror ahead to the island to secretly rendezvous with French authorities friendly to Spain, who informed him that Sampson had been seen going east from Cape Haïtien.

Evidently concluding from this that Sampson was heading for Puerto Rico, Cervera decided on a bold gamble. He would race west, to coal at the Dutch island of Curaçao, north of Venezuela, and from there race to Cuba.

Because of Cervera's careful precautions, keeping his squadron far out to sea and avoiding sending his ships into any commercial harbour, the Americans were not yet aware that he was in the Caribbean.

But by chance the false report seems to have convinced Sampson that the game was afoot, because he suddenly, for whatever reason, decided that the Spanish were not heading for San Juan. He told the Secretary of the Navy that though he could hold take San Juan and surprise the Spanish should they arrive, or at least deny the base to them, he decided it was false policy.

A sudden glimmer of strategic insight appears to have come to him, perhaps inspired by the false intelligence, into concluding that Cervera would use neutrals to give him the slip. He accordingly justified his decision to steam back towards Havana on the 13th with;

"The fact that we should be held several days in completing arrangements for holding the place; that part (of the squadron) would have to be left to await thearrival of troops to garrison it; that the movements of the Spanish squadron, our main objective, were still unknown; that the Flying Squadron was still to the north and not in a position to render any aid; that Havana, Cervera's natural objective, was thus open to entry by such a force as his, while we were a thousand miles distant - made our immediate movement toward Havana imperative."

This resolute singleness of purpose was an excellent adoption of strategic principle. Sampson had been tempted by San Juan, both as the possible destination of his enemy and by his own ability to take it by force. But had he done so he would have wasted several days on a tertiary objective while his enemy, with clear-sighted purpose, fixed his gaze and his actions upon the primary objective.

If Cervera had arrived off Havana while Sampson was at San Juan, he could have destroyed all the American light craft maintaining the blockade, which would make its reimposition exceptionally difficult. Once these blockading ships were scattered Cervera could disappear again into the waves, his next location unknown to Sampson.

Or, alternatively, Cervera could seek refuge within Havana, the hub of the colonial authorities in Cuba, and an extremely well-fortified harbour surrounded by Spanish troops and sympathisers. Once there it would be exceedingly difficult for the Americans to get him out again, allowing him to fully take advantage of the fleet-in-being strategy.

To prevent Cervera from dispersing the blockade or entering Havana, that officer's primary strategic objective, thus was perceived by Sampson to be the first priority of his own command. Since the US decided it could take Cuba by blockade, it became Spain's primary purpose to break that blockade. This made Cervera's ultimate objective known, the ships outside Havana.

Puerto Rico, however valuable to Spain, was less important for its objectives than breaking the American blockade. Cervera therefore had early on decided to bypass San Juan in his strategically sound resolve to achieve his primary objective.

Cervera must have been very elated and hopeful upon hearing news that Sampson had gone to Puerto Rico, succumbing to the temptation of that prize. For if Sampson remained there fooling around with lesser objectives Cervera would be free to fall like a thunderbolt out of the sky to shatter the American blockade and relieve Cuba.

But Sampson, led astray though he was, obviously recognised his error quickly enough. He could speculate as where Cervera was now, or was going to be along his route, all he wished without being any closer to the truth. It could be Guadaloupe. It could be Haiti. It could be Puerto Rico. It could be the Dominican Republic. It could be St. Thomas, or St. Martin's, or Trinidad, or any other island.

Whichever one it was would not have mattered, as Sampson at length appears to have realised. Wherever Cervera was now, or was going to stop to recoal, could never be definitely known by him. But where Cervera must end up undoubtedly was known to him. Havana. Instead of trying to guess which path Cervera might take to get there by fumbling blindly in the dark, Sampson decided to instead wait for his adversary at the finish line, where, in the end, he must go.  

At this point shall be discussed the fate of the American battleship in the Pacific.

It became a worry to the US Navy as to the whereabouts of their battleship, the USS Oregon. It had left San Diego on 29 March. Since the Panama Canal was not yet constructed, this war being a powerful incentive for that project, beginning only in 1904, in order to reach the Atlantic the Oregon had to go the long way around and pass through the Straits of Magellan.

Having rather clumsily failed to set a predetermined route for their battleship, the Navy Department had no idea which route it had actually taken or where it was. This was again a near miss for the United States. For at about 3:30 AM on 18 May, she steamed into the port of Bridgetown on the British-controlled island of Barbados. Here she refilled her coal bunkers and set out for the Jupiter Inlet on the southeast coast of Florida.

This was dangerous because not six days before Cervera had sailed past Martinique, unbeknownst to the Americans, and the arrival of the Oregon in Bridgetown was reported by the newspapers, by which means Cervera learned of its presence. Cervera was now much closer to the Oregon than was the Oregon to either its destination or its nearest support.

In the event Cervera, for whatever reason, decided not to act on this information, and the single American battleships was allowed to slip through his fingers.

While the Americans were worried about the the locations of the Spaniards and the Oregon, the Navy Department seems to have been struck with the same lucidity as Sampson. This may be for the same ostensible reasons as their admiral. Though Cervera was not actually in St. Thomas or Guadaloupe, the rumour that he was may have convinced them that the danger to the American seaboard, always very negligible anyway, was no more, for on 15 May Schley was ordered to Key West to join with Sampson.

In truth this ought to have been done from the beginning. The unfortunate report of Cervera at St. Thomas, despite being false, seems to have doomed the wily Spanish admiral anyway. The Americans were at last waking up to their strategic incompetence, and were at last concentrating their fleets before the primary objective.

Cervera entered into the superb harbour of Willemstad, on the Dutch-controlled island of Curaçao, on the 13th. On the evening of 14 May he had finished coaling and had left. At midnight of the following day Sampson learned that Cervera had been to Curaçao, inevitably reported by the newspapers there, but did not know where he was headed.

Sampson thus decided to despatch the requisitioned merchant ships Harvard and Yale to patrol the Windward Passage between Cuba and Hispaniola, in case Cervera should make for Puerto Rico, still apparently having that island on his mind. Meanwhile the Navy Department had ordered Admiral George Remey, commanding the light units of the blockading fleet, to withdraw from Cienfuegos and, if necessary, to withdraw from Havana too.

On 18 May, the same day the Oregon entered Bridgetown, Schley reached Key West. During the afternoon of the same day, Sampson arrived at Key West in the New York to confer with Schley. It was decided that Schley would go south with the Flying Squadron to blockade Cienfuegos and block the Yucatán Channel, should Cervera seek to reach Havana from the west, which the two admirals considered probable.

At 9 AM on 19 May, the Flying Squadron set sail for Cienfuegos. Later that day, Samspon's battleships, the Iowa and Indiana, arrived at Key West. Sampson, assuming that Cervera would strike Cienfuegos, despatched the Iowa to join Schley outside that harbour.

He himself then took the remainder of his squadron, the Indiana and the New York, to join the blockade off of Havana. On the 21st Sampson arrived outside Havana, while at around midnight of the same day Schley arrived off Cienfuegos.

The Americans were now in a powerful central position. If Cervera arrived outside Havana from the east, he would run into Sampson, who could fall back westwards upon Schley. On the other hand, if Cervera arrived outside Cienfuegos, Schley could likewise fall back to the northeast upon Sampson. Within such close supporting distance the Spanish would find it difficult to pin down and destroy either squadron in detail.

But for almost a week Sampson, off the northwest coast of Cuba, blockading Havana, was dangerously exposed. Having sent the Iowa to join Schley, he had only the New York and the Indiana to face the squadron of Cervera. If Cervera had struck Sampson, the New Yorkmay have escaped to fall back upon Schley, but the much slower Indiana could have been overtaken by Cervera's cruisers and destroyed while it was alone.

It was therefore no doubt a tense week for Sampson. Fortunately for him, on 24 May theOregon steamed into Jupiter Inlet and was told to sail at once for Key West. After reaching Key West she went south to join Sampson off Havana by the 28th. With the Oregon, Sampson replaced the Iowa and the US fleet was deployed in a prime position, either detachment being able to resist Cervera until the other could arrive to render assistance.

Meanwhile the Spanish had been curiously inactive. Having left Willemstad on the 14th, Cervera had steamed northwest to reach Santiago on the 19th. But here he stayed. He might have arrived at Cienfuegos before Schley, though if he did he could have been locked in there.

More dangerously, he might have sailed through the Windward Passage and make straight for Havana along the north coast of Cuba. If he had appeared outside Havana he might have destroyed at least the Indiana, if not the New York too. And would have additionally placed himself between Schley and his base of Key West, and between Schley and theOregon. essentially seizing the interior lines from his opponent. This does much to cast a negative light on the American dispositions until corrected on the 28th.

Yet, unaware of his enemy's faulty movements, Cervera decided to play it safe. The anchorage of Santiago was well protected with shore batteries, and Cervera thus decided to seek refuge within it. As it is obvious that the best way to implement the fleet-in-being strategy is to be shielded within a defended harbour, Cervera appears to have done just that. So long as his ships existed, the American squadrons would have to remain concentrated against him.

It is difficult to guess exactly what Cervera had intended. By allowing himself to be shut up in Santiago, he could not break the blockade before Havana, and it also made it difficult for him to reach the much safer ports of Havana or Cienfuegos. It was now also unlikely that Cámara would ever join him.

But Cámara may yet cause trouble elsewhere. In fact the Spanish government seems to have realised Cervera's change of strategy, effectively pinning the American fleet in place, for on 15 June they ordered Cámara's squadron to sail for the Philippines to destroy Admiral George Dewey, who had defeated Spanish Admiral Patricio Montojo on 1 May, and regain Manila.

This could have been a potentially serious problem. Dewey's Asiatic Squadron consisted of four heavy cruisers, the Olympia, the Raleigh, the Boston, and the Baltimore, together with a couple gunboats. None of these vessels had guns over eight inches in calibre, which would have been seriously outranged by the guns on the Emperador Carlos V and the Pelayo. The Asiatic Squadron would likely have been destroyed and the Philippines regained by the Spanish.

But events in the Caribbean were to prove decisive. Schley left Cienfuegos to reach Santiago on 26 May. Unsure of whether Cervera was really there, on the 30th he decided to return to Key West to coal. On the 29th Sampson set out for Santiago, as the Navy Department was convinced Cervera was there, leaving the Indiana behind to watch Havana.

Fortunately for the US, Schley decided to stay in front of Santiago, which allowed Sampson to join him on 1 June. If Schley had left before Sampson had arrived, the latter would have been open to possible defeat in detail, especially since Schley had arrived from Cienfuegos, that is, from the south coast, while Sampson had arrived from Havana, the north coast, which would place Cervera between them had he come out and had Schley
fallen back to Cienfuegos.

Once outside Santiago, Sampson took overall command, where he found that Cervera was indeed lying within the harbour with his entire squadron. He therefore imposed a rigorous blockade, maintaining his ships by coaling in relays. However, Cervera's superior speed over most of the American ships could still allow him to potentially escape, for only the New York and Brooklyn were fast enough catch him if he broke through.

Additionally, Cervera could remain in Santiago indefinitely, fixing the American fleet in place eternally. This was because the Americans could not hope to enter the harbour, a very protected one accessed only by a narrow and easily defended channel which would have been suicide to try to force.

And so a new problem arose to confront the US Navy that had been briefly touched upon earlier in the narrative. The American fleet could not safely divide itself to both blockade and neutralise Cervera, and simultaneously sail west to the Philippines to counter the threat of Cámara.

Given the fact that it's over five-thousand miles from Santiago to Port Stanley in the Falklands, and another nearly ten-thousand miles from Port Stanley to Manila, which would have been the distance necessary to cover since there was no Panama Canal yet; as opposed to roughly nine-thousand two-hundred miles from Cádiz to Manila, it is unlikely that the Americans would arrive before Cámara even if they were released from having to watch Cervera.

From this observation it seems to the author that the projected expedition of Cámara to the Philippines was an attempt to force the US fleet into excentric movements, compelling them to despatch a number of their warships to the Pacific, which could allow Cervera to escape, and perhaps to score a victory over the divided enemy force.

Naturally, therefore, it became imperative for the US to avoid this bait. The best way to negate Cámara's threat was by the destruction of Cervera before Cámara could reach the Far East.

But how? Cervera could not be destroyed in his anchorage, thus he must be forced out. This conclusion allows us to see another principle of naval war, a fleet-in-being can be countered by forcing it from its base by pressuring it from the landward side.

Meaning, in other words, that the US now had to land troops in Cuba to seize Santiago, so to allow it to turn shore-based artillery against Cervera's ships. If this were to happen, Santiago would transform from an impenetrable sanctuary into a deathtrap. Cervera would be faced between being surely sunk, eventually, in the roadstead, or taking his chances against the squadron upon the waves. Naturally he'd have no choice but the gamble on the latter as his only chance.

So this phase of the contest became a race against time. Cervera must be flushed out of his nest and eliminated as soon as possible. Once that was done, Cámara's actions became superfluous. Even if he were to defeat Dewey, the entire US fleet would be free to regain the Philippines, or even to strike the unprotected coasts of Spain, the latter possibility tending towards retaining Cámara in the Atlantic as the peninsula's only shield.

This made Havana doubly important for Spain. We already noted how breaking the American blockade was the only way Cervera could save Cuba. Having elected instead to remain in Santiago, he could not now prevent American troops from disembarking on Cuban shores, whose intention was to drive Cervera out to open sea where he could be destroyed, the latter still the overarching objective of Sampson.

Sampson had this objective because everything depended upon it. If Cervera were destroyed the Americans need not fear his escape to prey on their transports or cruisers enforcing the blockade. If he were destroyed troops would be free to land in Cuba and Puerto in force, which would result in their fall as they could not be relieved; while at the same time Cevera's destruction would free the American fleet for use in the Pacific against Cámara. Thus merely imprisoning Cervera was not good enough. He was neutralised for the moment, but Sampson needed him terminated.

Santiago is a magnificent and well-protected anchorage. But Cervera was dangerously vulnerable there. During the course of the Cuban Revolution, General Arsenio Martínez Campos established a fortified line along the railway at the narrowest section of the island, connecting the port of Júcaro on the south coast with that of Morón on north coast, with Ciego de Avila connecting them in the centre.

This served to separate the island in half. In the richer more densely populated western part of the island, the Spanish troops were supreme. They held Cienfuegos, Havana, and Matanzas, as well as most of the smaller cities. The Spanish soldiery was numerous and powerful there, and pro-Spanish elements were concentrated in that part of the island.

But in the east it was a different story. The eastern part of the island was more rugged, with the mountains of the Sierra Maestra and thick jungles forming much of the topography. Here movement was difficult as roads were few and in bad shape, while railways were almost non-existent. Movement was further arduous on account of the dominating presence of the rebels beyond the walls of the garrisoned major cities.

Campos, and later General Valeriano Weyler, perfected the limes by which these rebels were isolated in the east and prevented from harming Spanish control over the population and economic centres in the west. While this served to secure Havana, it virtually abdicated Spanish control over the eastern regions of the island.

Communications between garrisons, and between the Spanish military nexus in Havana, were dependent upon tenuous tracks through hostile wild countryside, especially now that communication by sea was prevented on account of the US fleet.

For these reasons it was much better for Cervera to be in Cienfuegos or Havana than in Santiago, for there he could depend on the powerful presence of the Spanish Army to protect him from the landward side. It would only be after a long and determined campaign that the Americans could push him out. But Santiago was remote from the centre of the Spanish base at Havana, and the untamed landscape of the Sierra Maestra that surrounded it was awash with insurgents. It was fatally exposed.

Contact was made with the rebels by the Americans, and on 6 June the US Marines went ashore at Guantánamo, about forty miles east of Santiago, to secure that splendid harbour as a base of operations. The Spaniards were thin on the ground, but offered stubborn resistance until compelled to retire on 10 June, mostly on account of the intense naval fire from Sampson's battleships, which also subsequently silenced Fort Toro.

Having secured this base, which the Americans still possess even today, General William Shafter was landed with around twenty-thousand troops on the beaches of Siboney and Daiquirí, about eight and fourteen miles from Santiago respectively, between 22 and 25 June. The clock was ticking for Cervera.

It seems meanwhile that the Spanish government was unsure of what to do with Cámara's squadron, possibly on account of ignorance as to what Cervera intended to do. Whether this contributed to the delay or not, Cámara only sailed from Cádiz on 15 June, heading east for the Philippines. On 2 July, his squardon passed through the Suez Canal from the Mediterranean to the Red Sea.

Back in Washington the Navy Department panicked at Cámara's sudden dash to the east. It decided to strip Sampson of two battleships and send them to the Philippines by way of Suez under Admiral John Watson.

This would have been a very silly mistake. Since Cámara had such an enormous lead over Watson, whose battleships were anyway much slower than the Spanish admiral's, he would undoubtedly arrive in Manila first. There he would find and destroy Dewey, and then could await Watson who also may have been destroyed, especially since his two battleships would be unable to escape an action with Cámara's much faster ships.

At the same time, while these battleships were thus stripped from Sampson for no justifiable reason, this would seriously weaken Sampson's blockade before Santiago. Remember that he had only been able to maintain it continuously by use of relays, so one or two of his command were always absent at a given moment to coal. If Watson was given two battleships permanently on top of that, Cervera's escape would have been virtually guaranteed.

Therefore Cámara's threat nearly achieved what it likely had been intended to achieve. Namely, the very foolish division of the American fleet which would allow the Spaniards a chance to even the odds.

Much to his credit, Sampson now apparently had burned into his mind the desire and intention to destroy Cervera with all haste. He made numerous excuses to delay sending the ships eastwards, demanding that, since his blockade would be reduced, that his remaining ships should be filled as much as possible with coal. He also successfully persuaded the Navy Department to delay sending the ships until Watson arrived from his position before Havana.

Sampson's determination to retain his ships in hand before Santiago probably won the war for the United States, for, in the event of his immediate compliance, he may well have cost his country her fleet.

Returning to the island of Cuba, it is recalled that the American soldiers sent ashore east of Santiago had a job to do. As soon as they had landed on 22 June, the commander of the Santiago garrison, General Ascario Linares, ordered that Colonel Federico Escario bring the nearly four-thousand strong Mazanillo garrison in the west to reinforce him. These promptly left Mazanillo later the same day.

Destiny hinged on the fate of Escario's march, an extraordinary achievement under the cirumstances. As such, it is worth a detailed examination.

From Mazanillo, Escario marched southeast, reaching Palmas Altas by nightfall of the 22nd. On the morning of the 23rd her marched east to Yara. Crossing from the left to the right back of the River Yara, Escario darted across country skirmishing with rebels that sought to impede him, before reaching the River Canabacoa at night on the 24th.

Moving northeast he arrived in Barranca on the 25th. He was skirting north of the Sierra Maestra, that stronghold of rebel activity, along the main road to Santiago, so he discovered that his next crossing, of the River Bayamo, through the town of the same name, was controlled by Cuban guerrillas.

Accordingly he was tied up for the whole of the 26th in fighting the insurgents for control of Bayamo, which he at length succeeded in capturing. He rested in Bayamo for the night, and set out east again on the morning of the 27th. Passing through Santa Rita and Jiguani, he found the road to the southeast at Baire barred by yet another group of guerrillas.

On the night of the 28th he arrived before Baire, and spent the whole of the 29th combatting the rebels and resting his men once the place was gained. On the 30th he set out again leaving Baire. At Doncella east of city and river of Contromaestre, the column again fell in with the rebels and fought an action throughout the day.

The following day, 1 July, was spent driving the rebels from the hills around Aguacate. After resting that night and marching throughout the following day, the Escario's men finally reached Palma Soriano on the night of the 2nd. Marching at a steady pace in the brilliant sunlight and savage heat of Cuban summer on the early morning of 3 July, Escario's men heard the guns of the two navies blasting furiously to the south, and listened to the shelling of Santiago by Shafter's artillery to the east. They were too late.

For the Americans had wasted no time in preparing their assault on Santiago. The Spanish were well entrenched at El Caney and on San Juan Hill to the east of Santiago. Shafter sent his troops to secure these two positions so that his artillery could then fire on the Spanish defences within the city. On 1 July were fought the famous Battles of El Caney and San Juan Hill.

With their modern German-made Mausers, the Spanish inflicted disproportionately heavy losses on the Americans. But after a desperate day's engagement, Linares ordered the Spanish to retreat within the city. Shafter brought up his siege guns and formally began the siege of Santiago on 3 July, just as Escario was arriving to reinforce Linares from Palma Soriano.

Given the spirited resistance of the Spanish at San Juan and El Caney, many have conjectured that Escario's arrival a few days earlier may have turned the tide and kept the Americans at bay. Historians also point out that Shafter's army was the only one the US had, and had it failed, especially if it had failed after being bloodily repulsed, then there could be no question of taking Santiago that year.

This would have raised numerous problems for the Americans. Obviously it would allow Cámara the time to reach Manila and destroy Dewey. It would also have, in all probability, resulted in the division of Sampson's fleet which was only prevented by the recalcitrance of the admiral on the spot. But it is not likely he could have prevaricated for another eight or nine months until next spring.

There's also the fact that what was left of Sampson's fleet would run the risk of being destroyed in a storm come the autumn hurricane season, as a hurricane actually did hit in September. The blockade would have to be lifted so that the ships could find shelter in Guantánamo, thereby allowing Cervera the opportunity to slip out of Santiago and seek refuge in Havana. If that happened, Shafter's success or failure at Santiago would in either case fail to achieve the primary objective of the US government, the destruction of Cervera. His expedition would have been in vain.

As it were, Escario arrived just barely too late, and this was primarily on account of the wasted several days in contesting points along his route with the numerous guerrillas that stalked the Sierra Maestra. These indigenous insurgents proved very valuable to the US, though they operated independently, indeed beyond even the knowledge, of the Americans.

In no better way could the vulnerability of Cervera at Santiago be more vividly illustrated. General Linares's closest reinforcements were not available to him by railway, unlike the garrisons in the harbours in the west of the island. They had to march through rebel territory using bad roads, with several river lines that were held against them. It therefore took nearly two weeks for Escario to reach Santiago.

Even so it was an impressive display of endurance. Escario and his men covered nearly one-hundred and twenty miles through hostile country in the same time it took the American forces to move from their beachheads to Santiago, distances that were even at their greatest less than twenty miles.

Investigating Escario's movement is doubly interesting because Sampson's perceptive judgement again saved the day for the Americans. The expedition assembled for invasion in Tampa Bay was ordered to sail on 8 June. But soon afterwards the Navy Department received word that there were hostile cruisers in the Windward Passage, based on a false sighting.They were ordered back to Florida. Sampson, on his own initiative, ordered them back out again on the 14th.

On the 20th they had joined Sampson outside Santiago, and, as related earlier, between the 22nd and 25th were landed to the east of the Spanish base. Sampson had immediately discounted, correctly, the possibility of cruisers being inthe Windward Passage and had rushed the troops to where they needed to be. His prompt action therefore saved a few days, a few days which might have allowed Escario to arrive and tilt the balance against the Americans at San Juan Hill and El Caney.

As tight of a corner as the US was turning, they pulled it off. Santiago was invested just as Escario arrived, with the forces of Linares decisively defeated two days before. With this information it appears that Cervera concluded that Santiago was doomed. He could not long remain.

Yet, he had no intention of waiting until last minute when the harbour fell and being given no other choice but to leave. This was because his attempt to sortie would be predictable and anticipated by his enemy's dispositions.

So instead, Cervera gambled on a bold move. While the American troops crept towards Santiago, he readied his ships for a breakout. On the early morning of 3 July, Sampson, not expecting any trouble that day, left with the New York to confer with Shafter on the beach of Siboney. That same morning the battleship Massachusetts left the blockade to take on coal.

This left Schley in command with the four remaining battleships, the Texas, Oregon, Iowa, and Indiana, together with his own heavy cruiser, the Brooklyn. The last of which being the only ship that could catch Cervera if he slipped the blockade.

Bearing this consideration in mind, Cervera decided to launch a sudden surprise assault upon Schley in the Brooklyn. Once that was sunk or disabled, the Spanish fleet could run for it. Once they were clear of the American blockade they could enter Havana or Cienfuegos long before the Americans could stop them, and the game would start over again.

The chances of this succeeding were reasonably favourable. If forced to stand and fight, Cervera would probably lose. But for that very reason he had no intention of precipitating a general action, not for long anyway.

Cervera himself, in the Infanta Maria Teresa leading the van, immediately engaged theBrooklyn directly. A duel began between the two flagships, until the slower Texas was able to come up against Cervera. His ship was pounded heavily and he ran it aground, hoping that his sacrifice would allow the others to escape.

Tragically, they did not. The Almirante Oquendo was very unfortunately struck by the Iowa, which caused a boiler explosion and sent her to the bottom. The Vizcaya was pursued by the Brooklyn supported by the Texas. She was struck repeatedly and gave a good showing of herself by a sustained resistance, but the Americans drove her in towards the shore, where her captain struck his colours before running her onto the beach.

Apart from the destroyers, all the remained of Cervera's squadron was the Cristóbal Colón. This ship was regarded as the fastest in either fleet, and had managed to outrun theBrooklyn. But she was caught by the Oregon, whose range was sufficient to hit her, when she was forced to make a southward move to avoid a peninsula jutting across her path. This change of direction slowed her down and presented a larger target, giving just enough time for the Oregon to make her influence felt. Damaged and no longer able to run, Captain Emilio Diaz struck his colours and scuttled his ship in the estuary of the River Tarquino.

The Spaniards had fought brilliantly and heroically, but that day they were particularly unlucky, despite the clever tactic employed by their commander, and the noble sacrifice of his own ship. The entire squadron was lost, Spain hadbeen defeated. The game was up.

Realising this, the Spanish government recalled Cámara, who had only the day before the defeat, it will be recalled, passed the Suez Canal. With the loss of the Caribbean Squadron there was now nothing to stop the Americans from capturing Cuba and Puerto Rico by blockade. Santiago fell on 17 July. Afterwards, on the 23rd, over three-thousand American troops were re-embarked on transports and plans were made to move on Havana, eventually to be landed in Puerto Rico on the 25th instead.

Recognising the futility of further resistance, Spain capitulated and requested terms. These involved the surrender of the Philippes, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Cuba to the United States. Spain's days as an imperial power in the Americas and Pacific were over.

At this point it would do well to recap some salient principles in regards to which this war serves to instruct.

The first principle is that a navy should always be concentrated as far as possible within interior lines. Both navies violated this by foolishly separating their fleets between two, or in the case of the Americans, three, detachments. That Spain was unable to take advantage of this was lucky for the US, and in no way evidence of superior foresight for the latter, who indeed took far longer to concentrate than they should have.

Secondly, once the primary object of the war has been determined, it should be pursued with clarity and unfliching determination. Tertiary objectives, like Sampson's demonstration before San Juan, ought to be avoided. Cervera's purpose was the raising of the blockade, which later became the anchoring the US fleet in place to give Cámara his chance and he, from first to last, fixed upon these with commendable dexterity. Sampson only belatedly adopted his opponent's superior strategic vision.

Thirdly, the primary object and the highest priority in a war heavily dependent upon sea power should be the destruction of the enemy fleet. Once this is achieved everything else can be attempted. If you undertake operations while his fleet still exists, you run risks of these operations being obliterated in detail.

Next, the fleet-in-being strategy is a powerful weapon available to inferior fleets, and this is best employed from the safety of a sheltered inlet. So long as the fleet exists, the enemy cannot freely employ his superiority for achieving secondary goals. Cervera's withdrawal into Santiago ensured that Sampson could not destroy him, and failing that, Sampson would be risking everything by dividing his forces while Cervera yet remained afloat. To
his credit, Sampson at length recognised precisely this fact and clung to it with all his mental and material resources.

Finally, when the inferior enemy fleet-in-being is safely ensconced within its harbour, every effort should be made to extricate it in order to force it into a decisive showdown. Cervera, unfortunately, settled with Santiago when the possibility of reaching Cienfuegos, or even Havana, lay before him. This was a grave strategic blunder. Santiago was by far the most vulnerable to amphibious operations of the ports at his disposal. It was only the danger to Santiago from land-based artillery that forced Cervera out, and it is difficult to see how he would have been forced out of Havana or Cienfuegos that year had he sought safety in either of them.

These principles are interesting to note because they were learned and employed in later conflicts.

During the Russo-Japanese War the Russian Admiral Stepan Makarov played the role of Cervera. He retained his fleet in hand at Port Arthur. So long as this existed Japan was at risk, but Japanese forces landed on the Liaotung Peninsula to drive the Russians out of their base into the open sea, where they were destroyed.

This was more difficult to achieve during the First World War. The Austrian base at Pola, and the German base at Wilhelmshaven, were too secure. Troops could not be landed to force them out. As a result the British and Italian fleets were locked in place for the entire duration of the conflict, which may have been taken advantage of, as Cámara attempted in relation to Sampson's fleet, if there were anyone willing to do so.

All in all, the Spanish, despite their initial mistakes, gradually had developed a solid strategy based around forcing their opponent into excentric movements. The evidence suggests the only reason this did not happen was because of sampson's fortitude. Cervera also chose Santiago when he might have chosen another port. Even so, Cervera's decision may not have cost Spain the war had the rebels not delayed Escario, or if Sampson had not collected the troops in Tampa Bay himself, or if the sacrifice of the Infanta Maria Teresa had succeeded in allowing the other Spanish ships to escape.

Therefore we can conclude this work by stating that Spain was not feeble and weak, att least, not in comparison to its American opponent. Spain had reasonable chances of success, had different developments prevailed. The deduction one is left with is that the US won as a result of Sampson's clear, if belated, grasp of strategic principles, and the good fortune attendent upon American arms, rather than upon the weakness and ineptitude of Spain.

The maps show the various geographic realities discussed in the narrative. The first map shows the positions of the two sides, and their movements ending with Cervera's imprisonment in Santiago, with the green lines representing the concentric movements combining Cámara and Cervera that Spain should have ordered at the outset of hostilities. Purple represents Portuguese territory, blue represents French territory, orange represents Dutch territory, red represents American territory and movements, yellow represents Spanish territory and movements.

The second map shows the belt of fortifications built by General Campos, and expanded by General Weyler, that divided Cuba in two.

The third map shows the route take by Colonel Escario in his rush to reinforce the garrison of Santiago, and the positions of the American landing sites to show their relative distance from Santiago de Cuba.

The fourth map displays the defensive advantages of Santiago and why the American fleet was unable to simply rush into the harbour and sink Cervera there, which will be briefly explained below.

There is a great deal of distance to cover in very narrow waters. Given that the outer roadsteads could be protected by a combination of torpedo launchers, sea mines, and shore-based artillery, the chances of large cumbrous  battleships reaching the inner harbour were about nil, and those that survived would yet have to face the fire of the Spanish squadron, in addition to the other defences, if they did make it that far.

For this reason Sampson rejected out of hand any suggestion of attempting to penetrate Santiago with warships. It was a task only troops could perform. The yellow circle represents the guarded inner sanctum where Cervera could retire to, while the red circle outlines the murderously close range shore defences would operate from, and the great length the ships would have to traverse to reach Cervera.

Given the narrowness of the channels, this would also force the ships into double, or even single file lines, which would be doubly prudent given the extensive mining of the channels. The necessity of avoiding mines would also slow the advance of the squadron, and if the ship ahead or behind started to list, it would block the forward movement of those behind or in front.

So basically the American ships would have been faced with the choice of either rushing ahead to run into mines, which would sink them, or else to creep around the mines carefully, which would make easy targets for torpedoes and cannons on shore, which would sink them. Not to mention possibly being trapped within the channels by their own damaged ships in the rear or van. Or in short, the very real possibility of losing their entire fleet before they even saw the Spanish ships.

- Kaiser